DgOb7: yo mayn
me: whats up
the kinks are so bomb kinks>beales beatles* DgOb7: yea
are they as good as the shitty beatles me: shitty kinks and shitty beatles are about the same shitty
i guess whats some shitty beatles? DgOb7: what
me: like what are some bad beatles songs
or ones you just dont like DgOb7: i dont nkow
me: ok fine
DgOb7: their aight in their own ways
me: yea basically
but kinks are alot more adventurous and artistic because they were nowhere near as succesful commercially as the beatles. DgOb7: haha
me: way bette rlyrics and song subjects
if you think it the beatles are a little geeky with their noob hippiness thyre all like OMG DRUGSZZ DgOb7: lol
me: know what i mean?
but the kinks write songs about weird shit like winston churchhill and WWII and australia and victorian england and their drummer was better im not knockin ringo i think ringos great but the guy from the kinks is like, a good drummer. his jazziness rockinness and experimentalness levels are all higher than ringos DgOb7: say whayt
me: like, have you ever listened to like the beatles or the beach boys and been like, "damn this is a gorgeous pop song, but i wish the n**ga on drums was just gettin live on the skins and straight up wreckin shit"
? well, thats the kinks! DgOb7: lol
yes haha brb me: the bass player is generally kinda shitty tho or at best meh but then they kick him out and get someone better
2 comments:
To me it seemed like the Beatles were the kids that excelled in english class as boys and the Kinks were the always stoned space cadets that managed to write one perfect poem but didnt write long papers
2 words. Mark. David. Chapman.
Post a Comment